The lactate-NAD+ axis activates cancer-associated fibroblasts by downregulating p62.

Reduced p62 levels are associated with the induction of the cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) phenotype, which promotes tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo through inflammation and metabolic reprogramming. However, how p62 is downregulated in the stroma fibroblasts by tumor cells to drive CAF activation is an unresolved central issue in the field. Here we show that tumor-secreted lactate downregulates p62 transcriptionally through a mechanism involving reduction of the NAD+/NADH ratio, which impairs poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase 1 (PARP-1) activity. PARP-1 inhibition blocks the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the AP-1 transcription factors, c-FOS and c-JUN, which is an obligate step for p62 downregulation. Importantly, restoring p62 levels in CAFs by NAD+ renders CAFs less active. PARP inhibitors, such as olaparib, mimick lactate in the reduction of stromal p62 levels, as well as the subsequent stromal activation both in vitro and in vivo, which suggests that therapies using olaparib would benefit from strategies aimed at inhibiting CAF activity.

Targeting Genome Stability in Melanoma-A New Approach to an Old Field.

Despite recent groundbreaking advances in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, it remains one of the most treatment-resistant malignancies. Due to resistance to conventional chemotherapy, the therapeutic focus has shifted away from aiming at melanoma genome stability in favor of molecularly targeted therapies. Inhibitors of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) pathway significantly slow disease progression. However, long-term clinical benefit is rare due to rapid development of drug resistance. In contrast, immune checkpoint inhibitors provide exceptionally durable responses, but only in a limited number of patients. It has been increasingly recognized that melanoma cells rely on efficient DNA repair for survival upon drug treatment, and that genome instability increases the efficacy of both MAPK inhibitors and immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the field of melanoma research which indicate that targeting genome stability of melanoma cells may serve as a powerful strategy to maximize the efficacy of currently available therapeutics.

Insulin Reduces the Efficacy of Vemurafenib and Trametinib in Melanoma Cells.

BACKGROUND: Despite the progress made in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma, a patient's response to treatment cannot be fully predicted, and intrinsic or acquired resistance that is developed in most melanoma patients warrants further research efforts. In addition to genetic factors, microenvironmental input should be considered to explain the diversity of response to treatment among melanoma patients. In this study, we evaluated the impact of insulin on patient-derived BRAFV600E melanoma cells, either untreated or treated with vemurafenib or trametinib, inhibitors of BRAFV600 and MEK1/2, respectively. METHODS: Cells were cultured in serum-free conditions, either with or without insulin. The activity of the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways was assessed by Western blotting, cell viability, and percentages of Ki-67- and NGFR-positive cells by flow cytometry. Transcript levels were analyzed using qRT-PCR, and γ-H2AX levels by immunoblotting and confocal microscopy. A luminescence-based assay was used to measure glutathione content. RESULTS: While insulin did not influence the MAPK/ERK pathway activity, it had a strong influence on melanoma cells, in which this pathway was suppressed by either vemurafenib or trametinib. In the presence of insulin, both drugs were much less efficient in 1) inhibiting proliferation and reducing the percentage of Ki-67-positive cells, and 2) inducing apoptosis and phosphorylation of histone H2AX in melanoma cells. Changes induced by vemurafenib and trametinib in glutathione homeostasis and DNA repair gene expression were also attenuated by insulin. Moreover, insulin impaired the combined effects of targeted drugs and doxorubicin in melanoma cells. In addition to insulin-induced PI3K/AKT activity, which was either transient or sustainable depending on the cell line, an insulin-triggered increase in the percentage of cells expressing NGFR, a marker of neural crest stem-like cells, may contribute to the reduced drug efficacy. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the role of insulin in reducing the efficacy of vemurafenib and trametinib. This needs clinical assessment.

Physiologically Relevant Oxygen Concentration (6% O2) as an Important Component of the Microenvironment Impacting Melanoma Phenotype and Melanoma Response to Targeted Therapeutics In Vitro.

Cancer cell phenotype largely depends on oxygen availability. The atmospheric oxygen concentration (21%) used in in vitro studies is much higher than in any human tissue. Using well-characterized patient-derived melanoma cell lines, we compared: (i) activities of several signaling pathways, and (ii) the effects of vemurafenib and trametinib in hyperoxia (21% O2), normoxia (6% O2) and hypoxia (1% O2). A high plasticity of melanoma cells in response to changes in oxygen supplementation and drug treatment was observed, and the transcriptional reprograming and phenotypic changes varied between cell lines. Normoxia enhanced the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucose metabolism/transport-related genes, and changed percentages of NGFR- and MITF-positive cells in cell line-dependent manner. Increased protein stability might be responsible for high PGC1α level in MITFlow melanoma cells. Vemurafenib and trametinib while targeting the activity of MAPK/ERK pathway irrespective of oxygen concentration, were less effective in normoxia than hyperoxia in reducing levels of VEGF, PGC1α, SLC7A11 and Ki-67-positive cells in cell line-dependent manner. In conclusion, in vitro studies performed in atmospheric oxygen concentration provide different information on melanoma cell phenotype and response to drugs than performed in normoxia, which might partially explain the discrepancies between results obtained in vitro and in clinical settings.

Plasticity of Drug-Naïve and Vemurafenib- or Trametinib-Resistant Melanoma Cells in Execution of Differentiation/Pigmentation Program.

Melanoma plasticity creates a plethora of opportunities for cancer cells to escape treatment. Thus, therapies must target all cancer cell subpopulations bearing the potential to contribute to disease. The role of the differentiation/pigmentation program in intrinsic and acquired drug resistance is largely uncharacterized. MITF level and expression of MITF-dependent pigmentation-related genes, MLANA, PMEL, TYR, and DCT, in drug-naïve and vemurafenib- or trametinib-treated patient-derived melanoma cell lines and their drug-resistant counterparts were analysed and referred to genomic alterations. Variability in execution of pigmentation/differentiation program was detected in patient-derived melanoma cell lines. Acute treatment with vemurafenib or trametinib enhanced expression of pigmentation-related genes in MITF-Mhigh melanoma cells, partially as the consequence of transcriptional reprograming. During development of resistance, changes in pigmentation program were not unidirectional, but also not universal as expression of different pigmentation-related genes was diversely affected. In selected resistant cell lines, differentiation/pigmentation was promoted and might be considered as one of drug-tolerant phenotypes. In other resistant lines, dedifferentiation was induced. Upon drug withdrawal ("drug holiday"), the dedifferentiation process in resistant cells either was enhanced but reversed by drug reexposure suggesting involvement of epigenetic mechanisms or was irreversible. The irreversible dedifferentiation might be connected with homozygous loss-of-function mutation in MC1R, as MC1RR151C +/+ variant was found exclusively in drug-naïve MITF-Mlow dedifferentiated cells and drug-resistant cells derived from MITFhigh/MC1RWT cells undergoing irreversible dedifferentiation. MC1RR151C +/+ variant might be further investigated as a parameter potentially impacting melanoma patient stratification and aiding in treatment decision.

17-Aminogeldanamycin selectively diminishes IRE1α-XBP1s pathway activity and cooperatively induces apoptosis with MEK1/2 and BRAFV600E inhibitors in melanoma cells of different genetic subtypes.

Outcomes of melanoma patient treatment remain unsatisfactory despite accessibility of oncoprotein-targeting drugs and immunotherapy. Here, we reported that 17-aminogeldanamycin more potently activated caspase-3/7 in BRAFV600E melanoma cells than geldanamycin, another inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). 17-aminogeldanamycin alleviated self-triggered compensatory increase in HSP70 mRNA level and induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which was followed by selective diminution of cytoprotective IRE1α-XBP1s pathway activity of unfolded protein response (UPR), inhibition of ERK1/2 activity and induction of apoptosis. Concomitantly, ATF6/p50 level and expression of PERK-dependent genes, CHOP and BIM, remained unaltered. This might result from an inframe deletion in EIF2AK3 leading to a PERKL21del variant revealed by whole-exome sequencing in melanoma cell lines. 17-aminogeldanamycin exhibited similar activity in NRASQ61R melanoma cells that harbored a heterozygous inactivating variant of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1P187S). In addition, 17-aminogeldanamycin acted cooperatively with trametinib (an inhibitor of MEK1/2) and vemurafenib (an inhibitor of BRAFV600E) in induction of apoptosis in melanoma cell lines as evidenced by in-cell caspase-3/7 activation and PARP cleavage that occurred earlier compared with either drug used alone. As trametinib and vemurafenib did not significantly affect HSP70 and GRP78 transcript levels, cooperation of MEK/BRAFV600E inhibitors and 17-aminogeldanamycin might result from a concurrent inhibition of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK cascade and IRE1α-dependent signaling, and cell-intrinsic ER homeostasis can determine the extent of the drug cooperation. Our study indicates that 17-aminogeldanamycin takes several advantages compared with other HSP90-targeting compounds, and can complement activity of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma cells of different genetic subtypes.

Exogenous growth factors bFGF, EGF and HGF do not influence viability and phenotype of V600EBRAF melanoma cells and their response to vemurafenib and trametinib in vitro.

It has been shown that the response of V600EBRAF melanoma cells to targeted therapeutics is affected by growth factors. We have investigated the influence of three different growth factors, bFGF, EGF and HGF used either alone or in combination, on the response of V600EBRAF melanoma cell populations established from surgical specimens to vemurafenib and trametinib, targeting V600EBRAF and MEK1/2, respectively. We report that proliferation and phenotype of V600EBRAF melanoma cell populations were not detectably influenced by exogenous growth factors. Neither cell distribution in cell cycle and CCND1 expression nor activity of signaling pathways crucial for melanoma development and maintenance, including the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, WNT/ß-catenin pathway and NF-κB signaling, were affected by the presence of different growth factors. We furthermore show that vemurafenib and trametinib abrogated the activity of ERK1/2, arrested cells in G0/G1 cell cycle phase, triggered apoptosis, induced changes in the expression of CXCL8, CCND1 and CTGF and the frequency of Ki-67high and CD271high cells. These effects were, however, similar in the presence of different growth factors. Interestingly, comparable results were also obtained for melanoma cells grown without exogenous growth factors bFGF, EGF and HGF for a period as long as 4 months prior the drug treatment. We conclude that the composition or lack of exogenous growth factors bFGF, EGF and HGF do not markedly influence viability and phenotype of V600EBRAF melanoma cells and their response to vemurafenib and trametinib in vitro. Our results question the necessity of these growth factors in the medium that is used for culturing V600EBRAF melanoma cells.

Vemurafenib and trametinib reduce expression of CTGF and IL-8 in V600EBRAF melanoma cells.

Clinical evidence has revealed that while RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway is a crucial component of melanomagenesis, other signaling pathways can also contribute to the malignant growth and development of resistance to targeted therapies. We explored the response of V600EBRAF melanoma cells derived from surgical specimens and grown in stem cell medium to vemurafenib and trametinib, drugs targeting the activity of V600EBRAF and MEK1/2, respectively. Cell growth and apoptosis were monitored by real-time imaging system, immunophenotype and cell cycle by flow cytometry, gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR, immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The V600EBRAF melanoma cell populations were diverse. Differences in morphology, pigmentation, cell cycle profiles, and immunophenotype were observed. At the molecular level, melanoma cells differed in the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, NF-κB, and ß-catenin, and expression of several relevant genes, including MITF-M, DKK1, CCND1, BRAF, CXCL8, and CTGF. Despite having different characteristics, melanoma cells responded similarly to vemurafenib and trametinib. Both drugs reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and percentages of cells expressing Ki-67 at high level, inhibited expression of CCND1 and induced cell cycle arrest in the Go/G1 phase. These expected cytostatic effects were accompanied by increased CD271 expression, a marker of stem-like cells. NF-κB activity was reduced by both drugs, however, not completely abolished, whereas the level of active ß-catenin was increased by drugs in three out of six cell populations. Interestingly, expression of IL-8 and CTGF was significantly reduced by treatment with vemurafenib and trametinib. Simultaneous inhibition of NF-κB activity and induction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation revealed that CTGF expression depends on ERK1/2 activity but not on NF-κB activity. Both, the positive effects of treatment with vemurafenib and trametinib such as the newly identified CTGF suppression and undesired effects such as increased CD271 expression suggesting selection of melanoma stem-like cells should be considered in the development of combination treatment for melanoma patients.